Not everyone carrying an axe is really a lumberjack
Ever seen a lumberjack in a casino? Most likely not, since most lumberjacks do not carry their axes generally around with them on nights out. But two stories have popped up in the news showing that non-lumberjacks don’t stick to these necessarily rules.
Axing For Trouble
The first of these two tales of violence occurred in a village bar in Fontaniva, Italy, in which a disgruntled gambler decided to exact their revenge on some naive slots devices after losing 5,000 euros (over $6,500) in 2 weeks.
The father of two, aged 48, was caught on CCTV cameras, footage of which has since stormed the media and video websites that are streaming where viewers can watch the gambler smash up seven machines as nearby customers dive for cover.
The machine hacker calmly strolls out of the bar, but not before giving a thumbs up towards the one-armed bandits after blowing off steam. Either this is a sign of victory, or a show of friendship towards these machines that are particular https://casinopokies777.com/royalvegas-casino/. Whenever dealing with crazy, interpretations are anyone’s guess.
The anger-released slot axe-murderer then waited calmly for arrest outside a nearby bar.
’ He comes in here all the right time to play the machines,’ said who owns the bar, whom chose probably wisely- to keep nameless. ’ He’s had some wins, but he spends a lot of cash. He is a laborer and only works any now and then.’ Apparently, that is one worker who keeps their equipment that is own handy.
’He’s normally a tremendously man that is quiet. He just strolled in very calmly having an axe and smashed all the devices. There were several customers they were terrified,’ he added by them at the time and.
The man was sentenced for six months for criminal damage and possession of an offensive weapon as a result of his strangely calm yet violent outburst. But jail overcrowding got him off with nothing significantly more than a slap on the hand.
But Wait, There’s More…
The 2nd of these two tales is really a bit more frightening, as the axe was wielded perhaps not at the slots, but at a person in the staff at a gambling store in the Welsh capital of Cardiff.
Police reported that the ’particularly violent’ incident left the shop assistant at a Ladbrokes betting store in Cardiff ’in circumstances of shock.’
Before raiding the till and making down with a few money, one of three suspects in the robbery was seen wielding an axe over their head, threatening the Ladbrokes’ worker with injury or even worse if he didn’t comply.
A police spokesperson investigating the crime stated that two men, both using ski masks, entered the bookie’s shop at 9:30 pm on the night of the incident. One calmly stood guard at the doorway, while the other violently threatened the associate with all the tree-chopping weapon.
The frightened store assistant then handed over what police described as a ’quantity of money,’ and also the men fled the scene in a getaway car driven with a third suspect.
Police are now appealing to the public that is local information that could assist apprehend the violent criminals, as unlike the Italian axe-wielder, they certainly did maybe not wait calmly for arresting officers to arrive on the scene.
Whose Casino Could It Be Anyway? Boston and Everett, Mass. Duke It Out
The battle continues over who gets to vote on Everett casino plan
Whilst every and each of the three certification battles for casino resort projects in Massachusetts has received its share of drama, none has proven more contentious than the fight throughout the casino slated to be found in the greater Boston area. Now, one Boston mayoral candidate is threatening a lawsuit over one such proposal that would put a casino in the neighboring town of Everett.
The legal choice is associated with the concept that neighboring communities could be afflicted with casino projects, but won’t have to be able to vote on whether those casinos is opened in the place that is first. Suffolk District Attorney Daniel F. Conley, an applicant for mayor of Boston, has been one of a handful of applicants who have recommended that most of Boston should be able to vote on a casino that could be positioned in East Boston, as an example.
When it comes down to the proposed Wynn casino task in Everett, Conley says that allowing only Everett residents to vote on it is unfair to the surrounding communities. If the East Boston proposal fail, then, he would register suit to stop the Everett casino based on the impact it would have on many Boston neighborhoods.
’The Wynn proposal was voted…on in only one community,’ Conley said within a press conference at City Hall Plaza, ’while residents and businesses from Charlestown to Somerville and beyond will bear its traffic, economic, and social burdens but get none of the proposed advantages.’
According to the state laws that produced the chance of three casinos that are new Massachusetts, only communities hosting casinos actually get yourself a vote on whether or not allowing the projects to be built. However, casino designers are required to negotiate payment, with arbitration required in the event that casinos and regional governments can’t come to a resolution by themselves.
Conley has proposed going for a path that is not really outlined in the 2011 casino law with regards to the East Boston casino proposal, one that’s being developed by Caesars Entertainment and Suffolk Downs. He could have the complete city of Boston vote on whether to approve the proposal, while still granting East Boston veto power on the entire vote. The casino would have to pass votes in both East Boston alone and across the entire city in order to be approved in other words.
Yay or Nay?
While Conley has not specified whether or not he supports the East Boston casino proposal, a Boston world survey found that six associated with eight mayoral candidates who answered that question were in favor of it, with just two coming down against it (with Conley and one other candidate not responding to the question). Meanwhile, four of ten applicants supported allowing the entire town to vote on the casino, while six favored limiting the vote to just East Boston. Another poll of Boston residents found that 44% were in favor of the casino, while 37% opposed it.
Even when voters back these proposals, only one will ultimately be chosen by hawaii while the future site of a casino in the Boston area. Along with the Everett and East Boston casino plans, additionally there is a competing proposal from Crossroads Massachusetts to place a casino in Milford.
Labour MP Disses Sports Books, Takes Donation from Retired Bookie CEO
Chuka Umunna, taken up to task for accepting donation
Chuka Umunna, cited as the increasing celebrity of great britain’s Labour Party who has publicly announced their discontent towards the bookmaking industry got his own hand caught in the activities book cookie container after accepting a contribution of £20,000 (more than $30,000) from the retired leading activities company that is betting.
Slaps Bookies While Accepting Donation
As a betting shop critic who has publicly decried the number of betting shops, Umunna nevertheless accepted the large contribution from chairman emeritus of the Gala Coral Group, Neil Goulden, causing members of the Conservative Party to call out of the shadow business assistant, claiming Umunna is guilty of adopting double standards.
Since Gala Coral Group is one regarding the largest bookies in Britain and accounts for a number that is large of outlets, with 1,800 bookies throughout the united states- it just didn’t really read well.
Umunna has even attacked the industry directly with a campaign targeted at reducing the spread of bookies and betting stores in the area roads of his London that is south Streatham, and went as far as to promise ’new powers to get a handle on the number of betting shops.’
’I know there clearly was concern that is huge some streets in our area are steadily filling up with wagering shops and pay day loan organizations that take advantage of our community, rather than help us,’ wrote Umunna in a report to local voters earlier this year.
’ Can anyone really credibly ever believe anything Chuka Umunna states?’ questioned Tory Party vice-chairman Bob Neill. ’He says one thing in public areas and does another behind closed doors. Their hypocrisy seems to be limitless.’ And that’s very uncommon for the politician.
Spared on a Technicality
Nevertheless, fighting back the corner of the Labour Party MP, a representative for Umunna stated that ’this donation was made by an individual Labour Party supporter in a individual capacity, and was accepted in respect with the rules and precisely declared.’
Officially, the donation from Goulden was registered as being made ’to support the workplace of Chuka Umunna in his capacity as Shadow Secretary of State for company, and for staffing,’ so it does officially pass as legitimate.
And even though Goulden is not any longer a relative mind of the Gala Coral Group of operations, the ten years he invested as managing director, chief executive and chairman of the group means he still provides consultancy services and chairs the Responsible Gaming Trust.
Whether it’s a completely innocent contribution or not, and whether or otherwise not the Conservative Party that are searching to ruin the promotion of a rival MP by claiming hypocrisy, Umunna was still a bit red-faced when the news broke, especially after taking this kind of difficult stance against the spread of the industry in his local constituency.
’ The thing that is only know he undoubtedly believes is that the capital is filled with ’trash’ and ’C-list’ wannabes,’ stated Bob Neill.
Umunna, who is thought to be described as a future Labour Party leader, has experienced his fair share of embarrassment as earlier this year their office had been accused of modifying their Wikipedia page to show evaluations between himself and Barack Obama.