Not everyone carrying an axe is just a lumberjack
Ever seen a lumberjack in a casino? Most likely not, since most lumberjacks don’t carry their axes generally around with them on nights out. But two stories have popped up in the news showing that non-lumberjacks don’t stick to these necessarily rules.
Axing For Trouble
The first of these two tales of violence occurred in a town club in Fontaniva, Italy, where a disgruntled gambler decided to exact their revenge on some slots that are unsuspecting after losing 5,000 euros (over $6,500) in two weeks.
The father of two, aged 48, was caught on CCTV cameras, footage of which has since stormed the media and video clip websites that are streaming where audiences can watch the gambler smash up seven machines as nearby customers dive for cover.
The machine hacker calmly strolls out of the bar, but not before giving a thumbs up towards the one-armed bandits after blowing off steam. Either this was a sign of victory, or a show of friendship towards these particular machines. Whenever dealing with crazy, interpretations are anybody’s guess.
The anger-released slot axe-murderer then waited calmly for arrest outside a nearby bar.
’ He comes in here all the time to play the machines,’ said who owns the bar, whom chose probably wisely- to keep nameless. ’ He’s had some wins, but he spends a complete lot of cash. He could be a laborer and only works every now and then.’ Apparently, this is one worker whom keeps his equipment that is own handy.
’He’s normally a tremendously man that is quiet. He just walked in really calmly with an axe and smashed all the machines. There had been a few customers they were terrified,’ he added by them at the time and.
As a result of his strangely calm yet violent outburst, the guy was sentenced for half a year for criminal damage and possession of an unpleasant weapon. But prison overcrowding got him off with absolutely nothing significantly more than a slap on the hand.
But Wait, There’s More…
The 2nd of these two tales is a bit more terrifying, since the axe was wielded maybe not during the slots, but at a person in the staff at a betting shop in the Welsh capital of Cardiff.
Police reported that the ’particularly violent’ event left the shop assistant at a Ladbrokes betting store in Cardiff ’in a situation of shock.’
Before raiding the till and making off with some money, one of three suspects in the robbery was seen wielding an axe over his head, threatening the Ladbrokes’ worker with injury or worse if he don’t comply.
A police spokesperson investigating the crime stated that two men, both putting on ski masks, entered the bookie’s shop at 9:30 pm in the nights the incident. One calmly stood guard at the doorway, while the other violently threatened the associate with the tree-chopping gun.
The frightened store assistant then handed over what police described as a ’quantity of cash,’ as well as the men fled the scene in a getaway car driven by a suspect that is third.
Police are now appealing to the public that is local information that could assist apprehend the violent criminals, as unlike the Italian axe-wielder, they certainly did not wait calmly for arresting officers to arrive on the scene.
Whose Casino Could It Be Anyway? Boston and Everett, Mass. Duke It Out
The battle continues over who gets to vote on Everett casino plan
Whilst every of the 3 certification battles for casino resort projects in Massachusetts has had its share of drama, none has proven more contentious than the fight over the casino slated to be found in the greater Boston area. Now, one Boston candidate that is mayoral threatening a lawsuit over one particular proposition that would put a casino into the neighboring town of Everett.
The appropriate option is regarding the concept that neighboring communities could be suffering from casino projects, but won’t have a chance to vote on whether those casinos should really be opened in the place that is first. Suffolk District Attorney Daniel F. Conley, a candidate for mayor of Boston, was one of the handful of prospects whom have recommended that all of Boston should have the ability to vote on a casino that would be located in East Boston, as an example.
It is unfair to the surrounding communities when it comes to the proposed Wynn casino project in Everett, Conley says that allowing only Everett residents to vote on. If the East Boston proposal fail, then, he would file suit to stop the Everett casino based in the impact it would have on many Boston neighborhoods.
’The Wynn proposal was voted…on in just one single community,’ Conley said throughout a press conference at City Hall Plaza, ’while residents and businesses from Charlestown to Somerville and beyond will bear its traffic, economic, and social burdens but get none of the proposed benefits.’
According to the state laws that produced the chance for three casinos that are new Massachusetts, only communities hosting casinos actually get a vote on whether or not to permit the projects to be built. However, casino developers are required to negotiate payment, with arbitration required if the casinos and governments that are localn’t visited an answer by themselves.
Conley has proposed taking a path that is not actually outlined in the 2011 casino law regarding the East Boston casino proposal, one that is being developed by Caesars Entertainment and Suffolk Downs. He would have the complete city of Boston vote on whether to approve the proposal, while nevertheless granting East Boston veto power on the vote that is entire. The casino would have to pass votes in both East Boston alone and across the entire city in order to be approved in other words.
Yay or Nay?
A Boston Globe survey found that six of the eight mayoral candidates who answered that question were in favor of it, with just two coming out against it (with Conley and one other candidate not answering the question) while Conley has not specified whether or not he supports the East Boston casino proposal. Meanwhile, four of ten prospects supported allowing the whole town to vote on the casino, while six favored limiting the vote to just East Boston. Another poll of Boston residents unearthed that 44% had been in support of the casino, while 37% opposed it.
Even when voters return these proposals, just one will ultimately be chosen by hawaii once the site that is future of casino in the Boston area. Along with the Everett and East Boston casino plans, there’s also a contending proposal from Crossroads Massachusetts to place a casino in Milford.
Labour MP Disses Sports Books, Takes Donation from Retired Bookie CEO
Chuka Umunna, taken up to task for accepting donation
Chuka Umunna, cited as the increasing celebrity of the united kingdom’s Labour Party who has publicly announced their discontent towards the bookmaking industry got his own hand caught in the activities book cookie jar after accepting secrets to more chilli slots a contribution of £20,000 (more than $30,000) from the retired premier recreations company that is betting.
Slaps Bookies While Accepting Donation
As a gambling store critic who has publicly decried the number of betting shops, Umunna however accepted the large contribution from chairman emeritus of the Gala Coral Group, Neil Goulden, causing users of the Conservative Party to call out of the shadow business secretary, claiming Umunna is guilty of adopting double standards.
Since Gala Coral Group is certainly one regarding the largest bookies in Britain and accounts for a large numbers of wagering outlets, with 1,800 bookies throughout the country- it just didn’t really read well.
Umunna has even attacked the industry directly with a campaign targeted at reducing the spread of bookies and betting stores in the neighborhood roads of his south London Streatham constituency, and went so far as to promise ’new powers to control the number of betting shops.’
’I understand there clearly was huge concern that some streets in our area are steadily filling up with gambling shops and payday loan organizations that take advantage of our community, rather than help us,’ wrote Umunna in a report to local voters earlier this year.
’ Can anyone really credibly ever believe anything Chuka Umunna states?’ questioned Tory Party vice-chairman Bob Neill. ’He says one thing in public and does another behind closed doors. Their hypocrisy seems to be limitless.’ And that is very uncommon for the politician.
Spared for a Technicality
However, fighting back the corner regarding the Labour Party MP, a representative for Umunna reported that ’this donation was made by an individual Labour Party supporter in a capacity that is personal and was accepted in accordance with all the rules and correctly declared.’
Officially, the donation from Goulden was registered as being made ’to support the office of Chuka Umunna in his ability as Shadow Secretary of State for Business, as well as for staffing,’ so it can officially pass as legitimate.
And even though Goulden is not a relative mind of the Gala Coral Group of operations, the ten years he invested as managing director, chief executive and chairman of the group means that he still provides consultancy services and chairs the Responsible Gaming Trust.
Whether it’s a entirely innocent contribution or not, and whether or otherwise not the Conservative Party that are looking to ruin the promotion of a rival MP by claiming hypocrisy, Umunna was still a bit red-faced when the news broke, especially after using such a hard stance against the spread of the industry in their local constituency.
’ The only thing we know he certainly believes is that the capital is full of ’trash’ and ’C-list’ wannabes,’ advertised Bob Neill.
Umunna, that is considered to be described as a future Labour Party leader, has recently experienced his fair share of embarrassment as earlier this year his workplace ended up being accused of modifying their Wikipedia page to show evaluations between himself and Barack Obama.